As regular readers of this blog know, we’ve challenged the advice of numerous TV docs and celebrity nutritionists (see previous posts on Dr. Oz, The View’s Dr. Steven Lamm, Joy Bauer and Jillian Michaels). Each is guilty of falsely propagating fear of trace amounts of mercury in all fish and encouraging viewers to eat less seafood despite copious research advising us to eat more.
Today, we add another to the list of offenders: "The Doctors." Back in June, we wrote to its producer and cautioned him—and by extension the show’s on-air talent—to clarify the full content of the FDA advisory when discussing trace amounts of mercury in seafood.
In our June 10, 2010 letter to producer Jay McGraw, we wrote:
"The joint EPA and FDA advisory that was issued in 2004 couldn't be clearer. The only populations that need to consider mercury in commercial seafood are women who are pregnant, plan to become pregnant, are nursing, or young children…
"We ask that in the future your program be more precise when it provides advice on fish consumption. In turn, I can put you in touch with our staff dietitian and director of nutrition communications, who would be happy to speak with your producers to answer any questions you might have."
We’ve never received a response to our letter. So perhaps we shouldn’t have been surprised when yesterday ”The Doctors” dedicated another segment to fish and mercury and—again—failed to correctly communicate the FDA’s advisory.
Dr. Travis Stork misled his viewing audience for a second time when he told them (as well as referred them to the show’s Web site) to avoid certain species of fish. Again, unless you are pregnant, plan to become pregnant, are nursing, or you’re a young child watching his show, this advice does not pertain to you. And if you’re thinking that avoiding seafood altogether is a sound “better safe than sorry” strategy, there’s plenty of scientific evidence that says otherwise:
We're baffled as to why "The Doctors" continue to reinforce an error that has already been brought to their attention. I wonder what his patients think of a doctor who apparently puts more stock in the word of environmental activists than in the latest scientific research from the world’s leading authorities on health and nutrition.