The New Zealanders aren't backing down from their complaints about the New York Times reporting on Hoki. In fact they're expanding their effort to get multiple editors at the Times to review the reporting and weigh in.
If you haven't read it already their latest letter to the Times really trims all the fat off the argument and pares it down to about three main problems with the report. There are some precise targeted questions the Kiwi's ask that really do appear to deserve a well researched response.
At this point the Times risks looking a little ridiculous if it continues to dodge questions about its reporting with the ole' agree to disagree line.
