Winston Salem Journal

(Part II) Errors and Bias Continue at Winston-Salem Journal

The Winston-Salem Journal has not made time to address errors in their article from yesterday, but they have squeezed in the task of pushing the story and its inaccuracies out on their newswire.  In an act of double irresponsibility and amplification of misinformation, the abridged and re-titled article, [Researcher triggers storm over study on tilapia] appeared today on Scripps Howard News Service.  NFI will be

Tilapia Story Tainted By Journalistic Mistakes

The Winston Salem Journal’s Executive Editor responded to our letter this afternoon and had quite a bit to say about his paper’s reporting (you can read the whole email below.) But what I found most interesting was that he wrote:

Sensational Tilapia Story Begins to Unravel

So, despite the warnings to the media it's happened again. A reporter eager for a sensational headline has botched a story about seafood science and in the process created an unnecessary scare. This time it's the Winston Salem Journal and its insistence that researchers have discovered the "possible dangers of tilapia." Suggesting that people should be warned against eating it because it might be "risky" and going as far as to quote a researcher who suggests eating bacon or ground beef might have more healthful properties.
  • A Seafood Lover's Guide
  • opah with yellow pepper-tahini vinaigrette over arugula
  • homemade pasta with gorgonzola sauce and shrimp
  • half off nigiri